Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

Slime time

We already know about politicians’ capacity for coarse behavior. But how low can the press go?
By ADAM REILLY  |  February 20, 2008


Nasty presidential races are nothing new. Eight years ago, bogus claims that John McCain had a mixed-race, out-of-wedlock child helped George W. Bush win the South Carolina primary and the Republican nomination. Herbert Hoover’s 1928 win over Al Smith was accompanied by rumors that Smith, who was Catholic, had commissioned a 3500-mile tunnel from New York to the Vatican. And in 1836, famed frontiersman and Whig supporter Davy Crockett accused Democrat Martin Van Buren of secretly wearing women’s corsets. (Van Buren won anyway.)

What is new, though, is the Fourth Estate’s distinctive contribution to the unsavoriness of the current campaign season. When Ann Coulter called John Edwards a “faggot” at the March 2007 meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference, it was easy to dismiss the remark as an anomaly, since Coulter’s whole career is based on her self-abasing need to shock. But in retrospect, Coulter’s comment was a portent of things to come. In September 2007, MSNBC’s zealously liberal Keith Olbermann accused the president of “pimping” General David Petraeus, the architect of the military’s Iraq “surge,” who was then testifying to Congress. Earlier this month, MSNBC’s David Shuster wondered aloud, with the cameras rolling, whether Chelsea Clinton had been “pimped out” by her mother’s presidential campaign. And this past week, Mark Halperin, Time’s senior political analyst, announced on Barbara Walters’ weekly satellite-radio show that Edwards thinks Barack Obama is “kind of a pussy.”

You don’t have to be a prude to think that, when it comes to national politics, the reliance on a junior-high vernacular is a mite troubling. Pointed commentary is all well and good. But how about some rhetorical restraint, too?

Pimp your news
Easy there, cautions Washington Post media columnist Howard Kurtz. “I’d be awfully careful about taking a few remarks by cable-TV loudmouths and concluding that the entire press corps is going down the gutter,” Kurtz tells the Phoenix. “Clearly, there’s some language that would have been unthinkable 15 years ago making it on the airwaves, to a point that there was a debate about whether ‘pimped out’ has become an acceptable part of the lexicon. But I think the fact that most of these incidents have been followed by apologies shows that there’s still a line that everyone knows shouldn’t be crossed.”

That’s one way of looking at it. Here’s another: these apologies, when they occur, are cynical attempts at appeasing the dwindling ranks of those who are actually offended by this coarse language. (For the record, Halperin and Shuster apologized; Coulter and Olbermann didn’t.)

And here’s a third. The aforementioned transgressions, plus a bunch of others — including Chris Matthews’s arguably misogynistic references to Hillary Clinton, which led to an apology, and the New York Times’ itemization of how many nights Bill and Hillary spend together, which didn’t — actually show that no one knows what the line is anymore.

Whichever gloss you favor, there are a few background factors worth pondering. For starters, the whole culture is coarser than it used to be. Yeah, people have been griping about cultural decline for millennia. (“I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on the frivolous youth of today,” Hesiod kvetched around 700 BC. “When I was a boy, we were taught to be discreet and respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly wise and impatient of restraint.”)

That doesn’t mean it’s not true. Given the manifold splendors of human society, there’s always a way for things to get worse. And they usually do, whether it’s Abercrombie & Fitch marketing thongs to tween girls or Jane Fonda dropping the “c” bomb on the Today show (discussing the Vagina Monologues, but still). So when CNN’s Kyra Phillips joked about making a “reverse Oreo” with her colleagues Gerri Willis (white) and Don Lemon (black), you could credibly argue that she was just surfing the Zeitgeist.

The texture of today’s media landscape is also part of the problem. We are, after all, witnessing the twilight of the media gods, in which the New YorkTimeses and CBS Newses of the world have to scratch and claw to pull us away from Gawker, Sean Hannity, and countless other news-ish entities that are frequently more entertaining (in a junk-food-for-the-brain kind of way) than their old-media rivals. So how does, say, Time magazine cope with this new reality? It hires Ana Marie Cox — who, as the original Wonkette, made extensive use of the term “assfucking” — as a columnist and blogger. And it taps Halperin — who, as the editor of ABC News’s political tip sheet The Note, brought a snarky new-media sensibility to an old-media company — as its senior political analyst. And Obama’s alleged pussy-dom (pussy-hood?) becomes a subject of discussion.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Ann Coulter , Ann Coulter , Keith Olbermann ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Slime time
"Pussy cat" would be a better way of designating Obama. He's not combative like Hillary Clinton, and he's not a pandering glad-hander like Bill. Hillary was right about plugging him for "change we can Xerox," in reference to the words he borrowed from Deval Patrick, considering the his noted rhetorical skills; but he is an intellectual, and in the end he has the right to avail himself of the help of friends like Patrick, who can present ideas better to the average man on the street, intelligent but not versed in Ivy-speak.
By gordon on 02/22/2008 at 6:32:34
Slime time
I think this is more people like you being oversensitive to the use of words like "pimped out." This is not like Bill O'reilly saying O'bama's wife should be "lynched." The word "pimped out" is pretty standard for "selling out." I think the fact it was two of your examples shows that. Don't you think it's a little boring that reporters like yourself settle for the same boring language we've degraded for years now...there's nothing wrong with unique voabulary. The question you SHOULD be writing about is what are their underlying motivations. Why does Edwards think O'bama's a pussy? why does Oberlmann think Mr. Betray us is "pimping" himself....wouldn't that be a better use of your time....
By cuse78 on 02/26/2008 at 5:11:17

election special
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULL DISCLOSURE  |  October 08, 2008
    As the candidates prep for the final debate, it’s a fitting time to ask: why do some journalistic conflicts of interest become scandals, while others get almost no attention at all?
  •   ROLLED  |  October 02, 2008
    Where’s the outrage over media mistreatment at the RNC?
  •   TWITHEADS  |  September 25, 2008
    Is it time to dial down journalism’s latest fad?
  •   TRUE DAT?  |  September 25, 2008
    Rory O’Connor ponders  the future of journalistic trust at Harvard
  •   BEATING THE PRESS  |  September 11, 2008
    Why McCain’s Machiavellian war on the media could cost him the presidency

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Music Features:
Saturday, October 18, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group