The Phoenix Network:
About | Advertise
 
Features  |  Reviews
-->

The eyes have it

Surveillance thriller Red Road experiences peek activity
By PETER KEOUGH  |  May 8, 2007
3.5 3.5 Stars


VIDEO: Watch the trailer for Red Road

We’ve come a long way from Krzysztof Kieslowski’s Red (1994), in which a retired judge falls into disgrace for listening in on his neighbors. Now, spying on citizens is a virtue, no more so than in Britain, where it’s estimated that the average person appears on camera some 300 times a day. Andrea Arnold’s first feature bridges that gap with breathtaking clarity and skill, illuminating a world where even isolation has lost all dignity and humanity, where making contact can come about only through obsession, degradation, and violence. How strange that the film is also such an uplifting affirmation of courage and desire.

Spying is business as usual for Jackie (Kate Dickie, feral in her sealed intensity), a Glasgow police officer assigned to CCTV, when she checks into a dark room filled with banks of dozens of TV monitors. Bathed in the dead glow of images from both tony and terrible neighborhoods, Jackie looks more like a weary, faintly mousy bureaucrat than a sinister agent of totalitarianism. Not only is spying for her and her colleagues just a job, it also appears to be benign, even maternal in its function. She takes interest in some of the regulars she sees, like a man who’s attentive to his ailing dog. She smiles at people who’re caught being themselves.

And she sits up and takes notice when a down-and-out young woman stumbles through back alleys pursued by a yabbo. No problem here, just a quick call to send officers to the rescue. But she’s misread the situation: the woman is a prostitute, the man a client. False alarm.

Or is it? Magnified in a Blow Up–like sequence, the pixeled figure stirs something terrible in her memory or her imagination. The man, we learn as she bends the rules with surprisingly little resistance from her department, is named Clyde. He’s an ex-con, but his crime is unmentioned. Was she a victim? Is she projecting her own masochism, sadism, or lust onto a poor schmuck?

It’s not that Clyde is unattractive — as played by Tony Curran, he has the ginger-haired virility of a young, seedy Kirk Douglas. He’s gross and direct in his appetites but naked in his pitifulness; fresh from being locked up himself, he tries to make some money by driving a van with the word “locksmith” and a phone number painted on the side. The women in Red Road seem to like him, and when Jackie — “undercover,” in tight jeans and a leather jacket — starts to flirt with him, he doesn’t seem a bit surprised.

Neither does Jackie. From the moment she locks onto Clyde, no doubts about her purpose or her plan crack through her nervously calculating demeanor. Dementia, perhaps, but never a second thought. So what was Clyde’s crime? What is Jackie’s connection? Is it real or fantasized? These mysteries propel the film, but they’re also irrelevant, much like the arbitrary rules about character and setting established by the Advance Party Concept, the Dogme-derived group producing Arnold’s film and four other related projects. The set-up seems more like a workshop exercise than the conceptual structure linking, for example, Kieslowski’s “Trois Couleurs” trilogy and The Decalogue.

Arnold, however, uses this artificial structure to sharpen her focus on the desperate, primitive emotions of lust and loss throbbing behind the spectral surveillance images. In a world where contact and betrayal converge, where public and private are the same and nothing, redemption can start with a TV screen.

Related:
  • Hindsight
    Rear Window is model for Hollywood’s latest trend, a fear-inspired peep-a-palooza
  • Crash victim?
    Krzysztof Kieslowski at the MFA
  • Devine DVDs
    Film-smart gifts for people who think they’ve seen everything
  • More more >
  Topics: Reviews , Red Road , Krzysztof Kieslowski , Andrea Arnold ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
The eyes have it
This movie was pathetic! Yet another ill conceived production by underfunded imbeciles. It is clear that the directors/writers had NO idea where they wanted the story to go for the first hour or so, they just wanted to create a feeling of tension. Their ability to follow through with a satisfactory plot to support this tension was comparable to intellectual impotence. Fourth graders could've taken the premise and made a better resolution. Be warned, the only worthwhile element of this film is that it provides an honest photographic depiction of gritty impoverished regions in Scotland.
By displayname on 05/17/2007 at 10:54:34

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SIMPLE BLOOD  |  November 19, 2008
    Twilight puts the life back into the undead
  •   WHIZ KID  |  November 18, 2008
    Slumdog Millionaire is a magical misery tour
  •   A CHRISTMAS TALE  |  November 18, 2008
    A twisted Christmas stocking
  •   INTERVIEW: DANNY BOYLE  |  November 18, 2008
    Slumdog slumming?
  •   QUANTUM MECHANIC  |  November 14, 2008
    Little Solace for Bond fans

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Featured Articles in News Features:
Thursday, November 20, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group